Fairfax County Police means police brutality

Where the hell is the US Justice Department? Why aren't they using RICO against these cops?

COPS ACCUSED OF FORCING WOMAN TO DELETE VIDEO

A man in Crawford County, Mich., was arrested and charged with felony assault with a deadly weapon on Sunday after he called authorities about a trespassing suspect on his property, his wife tells TheBlaze. There are also serious allegations being made about officers demanding that video footage of the incident — taken by the man’s wife — be deleted.
Thomas Donald, a military veteran, was reportedly out hunting with his 11-year-old son and armed with an “unloaded” single-shot .410-gauge shotgun (his son chose to use a crossbow instead) when he confronted a man riding a dirt bike on his 10 acres of land. The man and his son then reportedly escorted the trespasser to the front of his property and told his wife, Heather, to call the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to file a “recreational trespass.”
What happened when the Crawford County Sheriff’s Department arrived shocked them both, though Sheriff Kirk Wakefield tells TheBlaze quite a different story.
In an exclusive interview with TheBlaze, Heather Donald recounted what happened from the couple’s perspective. Her husband, Thomas, declined to speak with us on the advice of his attorney and due to the charges against him. His attorney also declined an interview request.



THE INCIDENT
When officers with the Crawford County Sheriff’s Department arrived on the scene, Heather says her husband held up the “open shotgun” with his left hand while holding the shell in his right hand to indicate the weapon was not loaded and assure officers he was not a threat.
The officers apparently didn’t see it that way. And while Heather later would start recording the incident, it should be noted that there is no footage available to show the moment deputies confronted Donald.
One of the deputies, identified by Heather as Shawn Schnoor, “fumbled” with his pistol and trained it on Donald, ordering him to get on the ground. Heather told TheBlaze it took her husband longer than the officer wanted because he has a badly injured back but he moved as fast as he could. Donald was handcuffed before police made their way to talk to the trespassing suspect.



Realizing how quickly the situation had gotten out of control, Heather said she began filming the scene on her cellphone camera.
In the video provided to TheBlaze, Heather can be heard asking why her husband is being arrested.
“Because we pulled up and he had a handgun — or excuse me, a rifle,” one of the deputies says, before being corrected by Donald. “A shotgun.”
Crawford County Sheriff Wakefield told TheBlaze that detaining the man was the correct thing to do because he had a gun and they didn’t know “who was who” at that point.
The deputy makes no mention of an alleged assault in the short video while explaining why they had detained him. Under Michigan law, openly carrying firearms is legal, except at certain locations — and being on your own private property isn’t one of them.
When asked if they would take the handcuffs off, he replies: “Not right now. He’s under — for our protection.” Heather said the deputy seemed to abruptly stop short of declaring her husband was “under arrest.”
Moments before the short 36-second video ends, another officer tells Heather she “can” stop filming. When she refuses, he informs her they need to take the cellphone as “evidence” and they move to take it from her.

“No you won’t!” Donald can be heard shouting, while still in handcuffs on the grass.
“Yep. Ma’am you’re going to be under–” one of the officers says before the video cuts off. Heather told TheBlaze the last word of that sentence was “arrest.”
Heather says she turned to walk away from the officers, but put the cellphone on the railing of her front porch after she was threatened with obstruction of justice charges. The deputies then allegedly confiscated the phone temporarily, but returned it to her before they left.
“They never told me why they needed my phone for evidence,” she added.
Blaze editor Jason Howerton discussed this story with Editor in Chief Scott Baker on today’s BlazeCast:
Heather told TheBlaze the officers later ordered her to delete the video footage she captured of the arrest. She said she complied.
However, the couple was able to recover the deleted video using recovery software, she says. The command to delete allegation has not been proven true, and Sheriff Wakefield could not confirm or deny the report because the deputies in question were not in the office and available for questioning.
If the officer took the phone for evidence, it was likely to see if any footage of the alleged assault was recorded, he claimed. The sheriff also said he doesn’t believe his deputies ordered Heather to delete it.
Heather provided the following screenshots that allegedly show the recovery software used to retrieve the video in question:

Vindicated Cop-Photographer Sues City



by Thomas MacMillan

It’s one of two lawsuits his attorneys plan to file, both featuring cops, cameras, and internal affairs probes that found supervising officers at fault.
Luna (pictured) announced his lawsuit Wednesday afternoon on the steps of the federal courthouse on Church Street, the latest step in a saga that led to the rebuke of an assistant chief, a new police policy, and statewide debate on citizens’ rights.
With the help of attorneys Diane Polan and Max Simmons, Luna is suing the city, the police department, former Police Chief Frank Limon, former Assistant Police Chief Ariel Melendez and other cops. Luna claims the cops falsely arrested him, illegally seized his property, and violated his First Amendment rights when they arrested him and confiscated his iPhone on Sept. 25, 2010, a story first reported by the Independent.
Attorney Polan announced that she’s also planning to sue the city on behalf of Jennifer Gondola, a woman who, like Luna, was arrested while filming cops. In both cases, internal police probes found cops at fault.
Gondola was arrested while capturing footage that drew the attention of the FBI, showing a man’s neck being stepped on by police during an arrest. The case against Gondola was dismissed. The sergeant who arrested her and stepped on the man’s neck was suspended for 15 days following an internal affairs probe.
Asked Tuesday afternoon about Luna’s suit, city Corporation Counsel Victor Bolden responded:  “The city will review the lawsuit and respond accordingly at the appropriate time.”
 “We have to pay attention to this,” said Luna, a 29-year-old medical interpreter who lives in Wallingford. He said the case has “big repercussions not only in New Haven but on a national level.”
Polan noted that Melendez, who retired from the force with several complaints pending against him, collects a pension of over $120,000 per year.
Polan said Luna is asking for punitive damages of $500,000, plus a declaratory judgment that it is unlawful to arrest people filming cops. The New Haven police department is not training its cops to follow the law, Polan said.
“We have the right as citizens to record police because they are public servants,” Luna said.
Early in the morning of Sept. 25, 2010, Luna was riding his bike on Crown Street when he came across some cops arresting three people near the corner of College Street. Luna pulled out his iPhone and began filming the action.
It is not illegal to record police action in public places, as long as the photographer does not interfere with cops.


NYPD Officer Charged With Lying on Arrest Report




In an extraordinarily rare occurrence, an NYPD officer has been charged for lying on an arrest report after arresting a New York Times photographer for taking pictures of him arresting someone else. But it’s pretty clear he isn’t the only one involved in the situation who was lying.
The officer, Michael Ackermann, 30, claimed that the photographer interfered with an arrest last year of a teenage girl by repeatedly discharging his camera’s flash in Officer Ackermann’s face. But the officer’s account unraveled after the office of Robert T. Johnson, the Bronx district attorney, examined photographic evidence and determined that the photographer, Robert Stolarik, did not use a flash and did not have one on his camera at the time. Prosecutors added that no other officers or civilian witnesses reported seeing a flash…
Mr. Stolarik, who has worked for The Times for more than a decade, was working with two Times reporters on Aug. 4, 2012, when he began taking pictures of a brewing street fight at McClellan Street and Sheridan Avenue in the Bronx.
When an officer told Mr. Stolarik to stop taking pictures of a girl being arrested, he identified himself as a Times journalist and continued taking pictures. Another officer grabbed his camera and slammed it into his face, Mr. Stolarik said at the time. As he asked for their badge numbers, the officers took his cameras and pulled him to the ground.
The Police Department said in a statement that officers had given “numerous lawful orders” for both the crowd and Mr. Stolarik to move back, but that he tried to push forward and “inadvertently” struck an officer in the face with his camera. The police said that Mr. Stolarik “violently resisted being handcuffed,” leading to an officer’s hand being cut.

Charges against Stolarik for resisting arrest were dropped immediately because there was no evidence for it at all. This is par for the course, though, the cops engage in misconduct, arrest someone who was doing nothing wrong, then lie about it and claim that they were resisting an arrest that should never have taken place. The other officers almost certainly should be facing discipline as well.

Bronx DA: NYPD cop wrongly arrested photographer


NEW YORK — A New York City police officer was indicted Monday on charges he fabricated the reason for arresting a photographer on assignment for The New York Times last summer.
Officer Michael Ackerman pleaded not guilty Monday to charges of falsifying business records and tampering with public records. He was released without bail and his lawyer had no comment.
Chief New York Police Department spokesman John McCarthy said Ackerman, 30, has been suspended without pay pending the outcome of the criminal case.
The Bronx District attorney's office said the officer claimed that freelance photographer Robert Stolarik interfered with an arrest in August 2012 by repeatedly snapping a bright flash in his face, temporarily blinding him.
Stolarik was on assignment for the Times, shooting images of a growing street fight in the Concourse neighborhood in the Bronx. He was arrested on charges of obstructing government administration and resisting arrest.
A probe by prosecutors and the NYPD's Internal Affairs Bureau later revealed there was no flash attached to the camera, and it can't discharge without the attachment. Also, the photographs taken the night of the arrest showed no flash was used and no other witnesses reported a flash.

The charges against Stolarik have been dismissed. He did not comment Monday. The Times did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.

NC officer suspended for arresting video-recording teen


WILMINGTON, N.C. — A North Carolina police officer has been suspended for arresting a teenager who recorded him making an arrest.
The Wilmington Star-News reported that Leland Police Sgt. John Keel was suspended for one month without pay for arresting 19-year-old Gabriel Self on Aug. 18 at a gas station.
Self was reportedly getting gas when he saw the officer arresting a man for possessing drug paraphernalia and started recording on his cell phone.
After he started recording, the officer approached Self and said, “I’ll give you two seconds to get your tail out of here.”
Self then moved inside the gas station and continued recording and Keel arrested him.
Self was charged with resisting a public officer and booked into the Brunswick County jail. The charge was later dropped.
Leland’s town manager David Hollis said citizens cannot interfere with police in their work, but police cannot prevent them from taking pictures or video.
Self’s arrest caused Leland police to conduct a department-wide workshop about its recording policy to avoid future incidents. Keel will reportedly receive additional training.
Self said the suspension was a bit harsh and all he wanted was a handshake and an apology.
Self said he wanted to record the incident because an officer allegedly forced him to show his ID without cause.